As digital transformation (DX) becomes a business imperative, CIOs are under pressure to lead change while balancing cost, risk, and impact. Here are six top challenges modern enterprises should be addressing in 2025:

1. Insufficient Budget

Balancing innovation with cost effectiveness is a significant challenge. CIOs can mitigate project delays by strategically allocating resources, such as adopting a balanced approach between in-house and outsourced teams. CIOs can further mitigate the high cost of software delivery by adopting platforms that accelerate delivery and reduce the total cost of ownership.

2. Digital Talent Skills Gap

The shortage of skilled digital talent continues to hamper transformation efforts. Forward-thinking CIOs are investing in upskilling, robust training programs, and retention strategies. Leveraging AI and low-code platforms can also empower existing teams to deliver at scale without requiring niche technical skills.

3. Lack of a Clear DX Strategy

A digital road map, underpinned by the overall business and IT strategy, is non-negotiable. Without it, prioritization becomes guesswork. CIOs must define measurable objectives and KPIs that align with enterprise goals. A clear strategy ensures alignment, accountability, and momentum across the organization.

4. AI, Data, and Evolving Regulatory Standards

CIO must stay ahead by implementing AI policies, governance frameworks, and compliance technologies, and partnering with subject-matter experts to protect and secure the enterprise and its data. In 2024, CIOs experimented with GenAI tools, but data-driven organizations can use 2025 as a year to realign their data, analytics, and AI efforts to seek out more strategic benefits.

5. Changing Customer Expectations

Modern users expect seamless, hyper-personalized experiences. Enterprises that fail to meet these evolving expectations risk irrelevance and a lack of engagement. CIOs need to enable agile systems and feedback loops that allow the business to pivot quickly and deliver meaningful customer outcomes, investing in service and experience design.

6. Digitization, DX as a Journey, and AI Transformation

Remember that digitization is required before embarking on a DX journey, and we say journey because DX is not a one-off initiative; it’s a living, iterative process. CIOs should champion a culture of experimentation and continuous improvement — launching new products, refining services, and adapting to market shifts to stay competitive, including infusing AI with great user experiences, effectively embarking on the new frontier of DX, namely AI transformation.

Download the extended list of 16 DX challenges your strategy needs to address.

In 2025, CIOs will need to prioritize the digital transformation challenges most relevant to them, ensuring their organizations stay relevant, keep on innovating, and are built for and with the future in mind.

Need expert advice on overcoming these obstacles? Looking to accelerate the implementation of your IT strategy with confidence? Partner with JustSolve, South Africa’s #1 digital transformation partner.

Ready to lead the way?

Book a FREE consultation with JustSolve today.

Data privacy is becoming increasingly complex and critical as organizations turn to AI to revamp their operations and processes. Among these advancements is agentic AI, designed to autonomously execute tasks without human intervention and act with agency.

For all its benefits, agentic AI’s reliance on vast amounts of personally identifiable data raises significant privacy concerns and fuels growing consumer mistrust in how organizations manage personal information. According to a recent Cloudera Agentic AI Survey, data privacy tops the concerns of respondents with 53% citing it as the main barrier. This has the potential to worsen when agentic AI hits the mainstream adoption phase in critical sectors like healthcare and financial services where personal data is prized at a premium.

Differentiating and Protecting Critical Information

The first and most crucial step in protecting consumer trust is securing critical and personally identifiable information. Organizations must invest in secure and governed data platforms that employ comprehensive encryption and tokenization strategies. These measures should be applied across all data environments, whether on-premises or cloud-based and across diverse storage solutions. Building robust defenses ensures that data remains secure while enabling the safe adoption of AI.

Addressing Data Governance and Security Mandates

As governments worldwide strengthen regulations to protect citizens’ data-privacy rights, ensuring compliance with local market rules and data sovereignty laws has become increasingly complex. The growing adoption of agentic AI adds another layer of difficulty, as these systems often require access to historical and cross-border data to operate effectively.

To address this, enterprises must adopt a granular approach to data governance, supported by a zero trust architecture — a security model that ensures no user or system is trusted by default. This involves accurately identifying where specific customer data resides, applying appropriate controls, and being prepared to produce detailed audit reports.

Building a culture of trust and transparency is essential for managing expectations around data usage and the ethical limitations of agentic AI. Implementing “privacy by design” principles ensures that privacy is integrated into AI products and services from the outset. As AI agents increasingly influence decision-making with consumer data, organizations must prioritize transparency in data handling to foster trust and reduce reputational risks, ultimately supporting long-term success.

AI and GenAI are having an increasingly pervasive impact on government — across missions, use cases, processes, and systems — in the Middle East and beyond. The disruptive impact of these technologies, compounded by geopolitical volatility, technical debt, digital sovereignty concerns, elevated citizen expectations, and regulatory changes, will require government leaders to approach innovation holistically. The acquisition and implementation of new technologies will not be enough. Realizing the benefits of AI, cloud, and industry platforms will require revisiting governance, risk management, culture, and the building of competencies to accelerate innovation.

Realizing the Value of AI at Scale in the MEA Region

The advent of GenAI prompted a surge of experimentation. Governments piloted GenAI for task automation, such as summarizing meeting minutes, drafting RFI and RFP documents for public tenders, creating job requisitions, synthesizing information to respond to freedom of information requests, and conducting research for the preparation of policy briefs. As pilot projects empowered them to evaluate benefits and risks, national governments and smart cities started to invest in scaling both traditional AI/ML and GenAI systems to address more complex industry-specific scenarios, such as service and benefits personalization, clinical care, and traffic safety. AI-enabled digital assistants started to help citizens interact with systems through conversational interfaces, instead of having to scroll through screens and fill out forms. Employee digital assistants started to help expert government case managers review, validate, and respond to citizen requests in a more holistic and personalized manner.

AI-powered governments will need to rethink their strategies, governance, people, and technologies to effectively adopt AI. This radical transformation will require governments to establish senior leadership roles that can build organizational capacities and competencies; design and enforce governance policies, structures, and processes; and deploy data and AI infrastructure, platforms, and application capabilities that align with strategic mission goals — all while complying with regulation. The MEA region is leading the charge; for instance, the Dubai government appointed 22 chief artificial intelligence officers (CAIOs) in 2024.

To achieve this level of automation, CAIOs need to work with line-of-mission and program leaders to re-engineer processes and systems so they can apply algorithms that recognize changes in their constituents’ circumstances, identify the root causes, and trigger operational workflows or dynamically reconfigure services and programs to meet constituents’ evolving needs and preferences.

From an architectural standpoint, this level of end-to-end process automation will require a combination of agents that will provide multimodal capabilities to process text, rules, and images, and will be orchestrated to deliver intended outcomes across end-to-end workflows.

To generate the desired outputs and outcomes from the application of AI and GenAI, government CAIOs and chief data officers need to feed data-hungry algorithmic training and fine-tuning. To avoid using low-quality datasets, which grow bias and hallucination, lower accuracy, and increase the risk of intellectual property infringement and other ethical and compliance risks, governments will invest in data logistics and control planes and establish governance polices and processes that enable them to control quality, reliability, and integrity of datasets.

Hybrid, multicloud environments are becoming the cornerstone for governments wanting to modernize their infrastructure, transform their applications, and take advantage of innovations such as AI and GenAI. FinOps practices and tools need to be in place to control costs, particularly as innovative capabilities are being tested and then scaled. AI will augment FinOps tools too, to optimize cloud resource sizing and usage, increase the transparency and accountability of cloud costs and carbon footprints, and detect anomalies.

Governments consider AI not only a tool for efficiency improvement, but a national strategic asset. They want to be able to harness AI to drive opportunities for the national AI innovation ecosystem and secure data and technical independence. This will drive new policy requirements for sovereign AI controls, such as data governance, data localization, and control requirements; scrutiny over hardware and software bills of material, algorithmic transparency, data protection, cybersecurity, and the ethical use of AI; and investments in local knowledge transfer. As a result of some of these policies, global cloud and AI platform companies have significantly increased their investments in local infrastructure and operations in the MEA region, with the Saudi Arabia and the UAE being the main beneficiaries.

As AI becomes more pervasive, robust security controls must be put in place, starting early on in the design stage for the hybrid, multicloud environments where these systems will be deployed. Security controls, along with updated governance policies and literacy programs, will be critical to ensure responsible AI innovation that minimizes the risk of misuse, such as generating misinformation, deepfakes, or biased content, as well as avoiding exposing systems to attacks and loss of sensitive and critical data.

Government CIOs and CAIOs that have a mandate to realize the benefits of AI at scale will have to develop trustworthy collaborative approaches to identify early wins, establish responsible AI governance and cybersecurity best practices, embed sovereignty principles in platform procurement and implementation, and apply FinOps best practices and tools to control the cost of innovation.